TEACHER > Media
Selection |
|
Media Selection
|
Download this module  
|
Overview
| There are a wide variety of items
to consider before you decide which media to use in your teaching.
Considering these items in your lesson-planning stage will insure
that your choice of media enriches the learning experiences
of your students and that your teaching will elicit the intended
learning outcomes. |
 |
Objectives
- When selecting media for teaching and learning, the learner
will be able to select media based on situational criteria (i.e.,
grade levels, subject, etc.) and media characteristics.
- Given a set of technology integration experiences (which are
to be retrieved from the KITE case library), the learner will
be able to compare and contrast the experiences in terms of media
appropriateness to situational criteria and media characteristics.
- Given a scenario for selecting media (or technology), the learner
will be able to adapt the information from the scenario and past
technology integration experiences (which are to be retrieved
from the KITE case library) in selecting media for intended learning
outcomes.
Activity 1: Considerations for Media
Selection
Read the following resources related to media selection.
Then, contribute to the discussions about this topic.
Resources related to media selection
- 13
things to consider when selecting media
This document provides a variety of items you should consider
when selecting media for use in your instructional activities.
- Media
Attributes and Examples with Its Strengths and Limitations
This document tabulates various media based on its attributes
and provides its strengths and limitations with examples.
|
Discussion Topics
When you participate in the group discussion,
relate your answers to the readings and your own personal
experiences.
- What is the difference between lessons that use technology
and learning that is facilitated by the use of technology?
- Does the use of technology guarantee an increase in learning?
- What are the critical factors that must be addressed when
determining the appropriate media?
|
Activity 2: Evaluating Technology
Integration of KITE Cases
Search through the KITE case library for 3 cases which
use a technology (i.e. digital camera, internet searching, educational
software, etc.) that is of interest to you and evaluate its media
selection. You will evaluate each case based on its technology integration
appropriateness in the discussion activity. Present the cases you
have selected with a summary, reflection, and suggestion for improvement
for each case.
 |
Describe what you think would
better the learning experience in terms of technology use
for each case and provide an 'overall evaluation' regarding
how each case is similar and different, and how each case
can be improved in terms of media selection process by adapting
solutions from other cases. |
To begin your search for technology integration cases
which use the same media and have similar situations such as topic
and grade, prepare a simple table of your interests before you search
for cases. Also, use the "Find Similar Cases" link provided
in the KITE case to find similar examples of technology integration
experiences.
The following are three sample reviews of KITE cases.
Don't forget to read the overall evaluation provided after the third
case. This format should be used to complete the assignments
in Activity 2 and Activity 3.
| |
KITE case
3167-1 |
KITE case
8029-2 |
|
| Target
audience |
Grade 9 |
Grade 10 |
Kindergarten |
| Subject |
World studies and western civilization |
World History |
Social studies |
| Technology
Used |
PowerPoint, Internet, Video camera |
PowerPoint, Internet |
PowerPoint |
| Purpose
of using technology |
- To present students' research projects
- To encourage learners to dig deeper
- To meet technology standard
- To motivate the learner
|
- Presentation
- Information searching
|
|
KITE
case 3167-1
Target Audience:
Grade 9
Subject:
World studies and western civilization
Technology
used: PowerPoint, Internet, Video camera
Purpose of using technology:
To present students' research projects / To encourage learners to
dig deeper / To meet technology standard / To motivate the learner
Summary:
This case provides two technology integration stories. One is a
PowerPoint presentation and the other is a video brochure presentation.
A teacher assigned research projects either to individuals or to
a group and designed instructional activities around the projects.
Both technology integration projects have the purpose of requiring
students to find information and to present what they have found
in their research about the certain regions. The PowerPoint project
is for Africa and the video brochure project is for Southeast Asia.
For both projects, the teacher provided 7 topics (i.e. the economy,
the people, the history, and so on) and let students decided 4 or
5 topics among them. The students researched independently or with
group members, made presentations, and presented in class. According
to the teacher's reflection, technology had an impact on students'
learning by encouraging them dig into a little deeper and focus
on the topic. Also, at the end of the class, students were really
proud of what they had done so far. The teacher assessed the students'
projects based on the rubric and the rubric was presented to students
earlier in order to make sure they knew the expectations.
Reflection:
This case is an excellent example of incorporating technology to
make students more engaged in their learning process, and thus enhancing
learning. The teacher designed the experience well and managed the
technology integration in the class by considering almost all important
elements for media selection. First, the teacher used technologies
to support the students' learning activities and help them to achieve
the learning goals; which were understanding the regions and being
able to present what they have researched. Also, the Internet was
used as one of the research tools. Second, the technologies used
seemed to be appropriate for the grade level of students. However,
the teacher understood that students had different levels of technology
competency and accessibility. For example, the teacher considered
the students' socio-economic level that has an impact on their exposure
to technology. Thus, the teacher took that into account and prepared
other ways for the students to achieve the learning outcomes (i.e.
poster board). Also, the teacher let students know that they could
get help the teacher at any time during the project. Third, the
time-line had been carefully scheduled to manage the class including
the time needed for preparing students to be able to manipulate
the technology well enough for them to make a presentation. For
instance, the teacher provided instruction on filming techniques
for the video brochure project. Fourth, the teacher made it clear
what was expected by providing clear assignment descriptions with
exemplary projects from previous years and by providing rubrics.
These helped the students focus on the content and prevented them
from just focusing on learning the technology.
Suggestions for
Improvement: This case could be improved by
considering the direct and indirect costs to the student more in
the design stage of technology integration. Although the teacher
was aware of the students' different exposure and accessibility
to use a particular technology such as a digital camcorder, and
the media center had 3 or 4 camcorders available for students to
check out, it might not have been enough. Also, students' prior
knowledge and skills and affordability of technology had an impact
on the quality of making the presentations. For instance, students
who had access to a scanner and had experience of using iMovie made
fancier PowerPoint presentation and video brochure than other students.
Thus, the teacher should take this into consideration when assessing
the students' projects.
KITE
case 8029-2
Target Audience:
Grade 10
Subject:
World History
Technology used: PowerPoint,
Internet
Purpose of using technology:
Presentation, Information searching
Summary: After
covering the French Revolution in detail, a teacher assigned a research
project to students which involved studying Latin American Revolutionaries
individually and then required them to do PowerPoint presentations
as a backdrop for an oral report. The teacher hoped that the students
would become acquainted with famous people from other revolutions.
They researched online in the computer lab and spent three days
creating PowerPoint presentations. The students used online clip-art
and images from the Internet. The teacher reflected that more guidance
should have been provided in using technology to transfer information
more effectively and which would have reduced the amount of difficulties
in managing the students because they wanted to try every single
element in PowerPoint.
Reflection:
In this case, the teacher used technology as a tool to present what
students have researched and the difficulty level of technology
seemed to be appropriate to the target audience. The teacher had
a hard time during class due to the incapability of the computers
in the school to hold a large number of examples. The teacher could
have reduced this problem by examining the technology capability
ahead of time. With this problem, the students were frustrated.
In addition, the students were not sure how they would be assessed.
Suggestions for
Improvement: This case could be improved by
explaining tbe task to the students more clearly including the teacher's
expectations for the final product. For this, the teacher could
have provided a rubric to students with examples of work. This rubric
could have been used when the teacher assessed the students' work.
Also, if the teacher had known the capacity limitation of the school
computers, a plan could have been made for another way for students
to present or bring up what they have prepared. Finally, the class
activities need to be more structured.
KITE case 3032-2
Target Audience:
Kindergarten
Subject:
Social studies
Technology used: PowerPoint
Purpose of using technology:
Presentation / Motivation
Summary: A
kindergarten teacher wanted students to make a presentation using
Hyper Studio and to see some other uses of technology besides playing
games with it. But the teacher did not own the program, and thus
she used PowerPoint instead of Hyper Studio. The teacher assumed
that the students would be able to do tbe activity by themselves
after she showed how to do it. However, it turned out that the program
was too complicated for little children to use and they could not
do the activity by themselves. Thus, the teacher changed the activity
and let students decorate the printed pages and they made a book.
Reflection: This
case shows the importance of learner analysis in terms of their
ability in using technology, especially when you want them to manipulate
certain software by themselves. The teacher assumed that the students
possessed a certain level of technology competency, and they would
be able to follow a demonstration. However, they could not. The
teacher ended up with a different activity for the students which
required the students to make a book by decorating printed pages.
The case did not describe whether the revised activity was aligned
with the original goals. It is obvious when the teacher changed
the program from Hyper Studio to PowerPoint based on the practical
factor of program availability, user expertise and user familiarity
in using technology was not considered.
Suggestions for
Improvement: The learning situation in this
case could have been improved if the teacher had used a simper and
easier technology which would be more appropriate for kindergarten
students and if the teacher had planned the activity ahead in detail.
In order to do that, the teacher would need to have knowledge and
understanding about the students' ability to understanding abstract
symbols, reading, and so on. If possible, the teacher could have
done a test with one or two children in order to make that kind
of judgment.
Overall Evaluation
The preceding three cases have each used PowerPoint
as the technology for the students' task. These three cases are
very similar in that the students were required to present information
with PowerPoint. The target audiences for the first two cases (KITE
case NO. 3167-1 and KITE case NO. 8029-2) are about the same age
level. The students in both cases did research on the Internet and
made the PowerPoint presentations in order to present their research
results in class. In the second case the teacher could adapt the
first case teacher's methods to solve the problems in the class;
the students' lack of knowledge and skills in using PowerPoint to
present information effectively. The teacher could have done the
following to improve the learning experience:
- Provide clear assignment descriptions with exemplary projects
from previous years and provide rubrics in order to make sure
students are aware of the expectations for the task.
- Plan the details of the instruction ahead of time.
The first case teacher could also benefit from some
information from the second case teacher. For instance, the first
case teacher mentioned that the students who had a scanner or other
technologies to use at home made fancier PowerPoint presentations
than other students who did not have access to those technologies.
In the second case, the first case teacher might adopt some solutions
for this problem to make it possible for student to use online clip-art
and download images from the Internet.
Although the third case has a different target audience
from the two other cases, the third case teacher could benefit from
the other cases regarding what to consider when using technology
in class; students' technology competency, how to structure learning
activities appropriate to the target audience, and how to prepare
a backup plan.
Rubric for Activity 2 Assignment
| "A"
range |
The report contains a
table of case details, three detailed case summaries, an
in-depth reflection on each case, and suggestions for improvement
for each case. The overall evaluation is complete and discusses
how the cases could be improved using ideas from other cases.
|
| "B" range |
The report contains a table of case
details, three case summaries, a reflection on each case,
and suggestions for improvement for each case. The overall
evaluation is complete and discusses how the cases could
be improved. |
| "C" range |
The report contains a table of case
details, three case summaries, some reflection on each case,
and suggestions for improvement for each case. The overall
evaluation discusses how the cases could be improved. |
| "D" range |
Failure to complete assignment. |
Activity 3: Selecting Technology
for Intended Learning Outcomes
Scenario
After attending a recent teacher
workshop on technology integration, you start thinking that
you would like to be able to use technology in order to support
your students’ decision making. In the past, you have
taught your students using traditional methods, explaining
how to make a decision. Although you did this activity with
several real-world examples and let the students practice,
the students did not show the desired level of understanding.
|
 |
You are planning to teach the same topic soon, and
so you decide to hear how other teachers designed their learning
activities for the learning outcome and instructional activity.
Assignment
Search through the KITE
case library for cases in a grade and subject of your interest.
Select three cases to evaluate in the same format as above.
Your report should include a table for each case,
case details as shown above and the overall evaluation for the three
cases.
Rubric for Activity 3 Assignment
| "A"
range |
The index of interests
is well defined and based on the scenario. Selected technology(s)
is aligned with intended learning outcome and instructional
activities. The learning activity and technology used is
appropriate to the target audience and subject. Technology(s)
selection is based on identified similarities and differences
among retrieved KITE cases using KITE index terms, and appropriate
case components for the situation are well defined. In addition,
the reason of choosing the technology(s) is well described
including a concrete description of how it will support
the purpose of using it. |
| "B" range |
The index of interests is briefly
defined and based on the scenario. Selected technology(s)
is somewhat aligned with intended learning outcome and instructional
activities. The learning activity and technology used is
appropriate to the target audience and subject. Technology(s)
selection is closely related to identified similarities
and differences among retrieved KITE cases using KITE index
terms, and appropriate case components for the situation
are somewhat defined. In addition, the reason of choosing
the technology(s) is briefly described including a description
of how it will support the purpose of using it. |
| "C" range |
The index of interests is not defined
enough to retrieve cases and does not effectively capture
the core attributes of the scenario. Selected technology(s)
is somewhat aligned with intended learning outcome and instructional
activities. It is not clear if selected technology(s) is
appropriate to the target audience and subject. Technology(s)
selection is not based on identified similarities and differences
among retrieved KITE cases using KITE index terms, and appropriate
case components for the situation are not defined. The technology
selection process does not show reasoning process and fails
to describe how it will support the purpose of using it.
|
| "D" range |
Failure to complete assignment. |
|